Holland Park wrote:My casting call was unpaid but on spec, it's a TV pilot so if it's picked up - which it looks like it might be (touch wood) - then everyone gets paid down the line. And the response wasn't that bad, over 1000 applications, but that only ONE agent wanted a piece of that for his clients was a bit of a shocker. At the very least, it's worth a 'can you tell me more about the project' e-mail, just to see what's up there.
Well... I don't know about that. Is that how it works? Isn't the pilot a sort of calling card? Would you expect the producers who pick it up, to pay for the expenses incurred in the making of the calling card?
The trouble is, if it is picked up, the people with the money will be in the driving seat and they will want to employ the most bankable/experienced people they can. There is no guarantee that the people who took part in an unpaid capacity will be employed when there is money available - is there? Presumably you are looking for someone else to pick up the tab so you might not be able to insist that the people who came on board in an unpaid capacity are used again. Indeed, once there is money available, won't YOU want to get the very best talent the money can buy?
I'm not really surprised that agents didn't respond to an unpaid casting call. There are so many unpaid projects around that it can be hard to distinguish those that can provide some useful experience from those that, well ....don't! My agent would certainly be very unlikely to pursue unpaid work for me and I wouldn't expect her to. If I choose to do unpaid work, then this is definitely something I would expect to find for myself.
I'm not knocking what you are doing - it's great that you are being proactive and I know how much works goes into getting productions off the ground - so all credit to you. I just don't agree that agents should be criticised for not responding to casting calls for no money!
Holland Park wrote:There's a strong argument, too, that you should never have an agent without having a manager, too. But that's personal preference more than anything
I think that's more common in the States than the UK.
Holland Park wrote:I know a lot of people who have gripes with their agencies
I know lots of people who have gripes with their agents too. I think that lots of people may not appreciate just how much works agents do for their clients. An agent cannot insist that a client is seen for a job - unless they are at the top of the tree, and sometimes not even then.
Agent do earn from you working, providing you are working for money. However, I can see why agents want commission from jobs you "get yourself" because they may have done a lot of the groundwork in getting you seen and they will have been doing a heck of a lot of work on
trying to get you seen for jobs. They also work to get you seen for auditions and you may not get the job! I suspect a solicitor would charge you more than an agent for sorting out the paperwork on a couple of days on a film set

...
I'm kind of being devil's advocate here. I do wish you well with your project!