Making an impact in auditions and getting feedback
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:15 pm
I thought I'd start a new topic (away from the agency application threads
) about the difficulty of making an impact in auditions and also the dilemma faced by those doing the auditioning when asked for feedback.
I've done quite a lot of auditions for different things and I've also auditioned a few people and watched many more auditions at various times.
I think the unpredictable nature of it all is really hard to come to terms with and our desire to know why we were not successful can at times be counter-productive.
If you are auditioning for drama school (and I'm guessing that auditioning for an agency will have some similarities), then the auditioner will be looking for potential and someone who fits in to the mix of others they are considering. You can do nothing at all about the latter...
There will be some people that just shine, that have something about them that makes the auditioner sit up in his/her seat and think "wow, that's really interesting". It is possible to see this spark within seconds. Others might not be quite so remarkable, but there will be some kick or quirk that an auditioner feels is worth exploring - and that will take longer to do. There might be others who are solidly and dependably good. For these people, it can just be chance as to whether their particular brand of solid and dependable is something the auditioner thinks will be a good fit in the company/school/agency... and chance is such a hard thing to accept or make sense of.
When you audition for parts, it's even more unpredictable! You can do a brilliant audition but someone else will just be "more right" than you. There are so many reasons not to choose you and many of them won't be within your control at all.
Feedback is really hard to give (as well as hard to receive sometimes!). Sometimes the truth is that you weren't very good, or that nerves overcame you. You might know this anyway, but hearing it is still very hard. Sometimes the person will try to dress the feedback up a bit and make it a bit kinder - and that can be confusing. Someone asked me for feedback from an audition and I found myself saying "you seemed to lack confidence, and I thought perhaps nerves got to you", whereas I actually thought she was rather rude and very wooden (though nerves might have had something to do with both these things). Sometimes (and I do think this is often the case) the auditioner doesn't have time to give you detailed feedback and so gives something entirely useless "just not quite right this time" - from which you can learn nothing at all. It doesn't even mean that they thought you were good, or in the running, because I'd be prepared to bet they give the same vague feedback to everyone! Occasionally you will get someone who will bother to give you more detailed feedback - but this can lead to endless agonising and you may not be satisfied even then. In my experience, more detailed feedback will often produce the urge to ask "what exactly do you mean by...."? - and of course CDs/Directors don't have time to discuss or clarify their feedback because they have a job to get on with!
The best way to get feedback I think, is from someone you trust, who knows your acting well - who can advise you and teach you and help you on your acting journey, with occasional help from an outside eye. In other words, feedback about your acting skills, not about a particular audition. I think that this is sort of thing that can help you to do better in future auditions (though you still may not get the job). I think audition practice is a good idea - to see whether you have some bad habits and to get you used to the bits of auditioning that don't have much to do with your acting skills.
Another problem with feedback is that if it deals with something technical (which is more likely for dancers and singers probably), then, although it can be very useful to highlight a skill area you can work on, it ignores the fact that is NOT someone with the best skill level that always gets the job. It's not like being a 100m runner, where the winner is the one who reaches the line first. How often have you watched someone with fantastic technique who leaves you unmoved, or someone who sings a song less than perfectly but who moves you to tears?
The other obvious problem with feedback is that one man's meat is another man's poison. You might "fix" a problem that someone else might regard as something wonderfully unique about you.
The other way to get feedback is indirectly : if you have been called in by a Casting Director and didn't get the job, and then that CD calls you in again it is a fair indication that they thought you did a good job last time. That should give you confidence. Also being pencilled or short-listed for a job (however frustrating it is not getting it) is very good feedback...
Anyone else have any views on this?

I've done quite a lot of auditions for different things and I've also auditioned a few people and watched many more auditions at various times.
I think the unpredictable nature of it all is really hard to come to terms with and our desire to know why we were not successful can at times be counter-productive.
If you are auditioning for drama school (and I'm guessing that auditioning for an agency will have some similarities), then the auditioner will be looking for potential and someone who fits in to the mix of others they are considering. You can do nothing at all about the latter...
There will be some people that just shine, that have something about them that makes the auditioner sit up in his/her seat and think "wow, that's really interesting". It is possible to see this spark within seconds. Others might not be quite so remarkable, but there will be some kick or quirk that an auditioner feels is worth exploring - and that will take longer to do. There might be others who are solidly and dependably good. For these people, it can just be chance as to whether their particular brand of solid and dependable is something the auditioner thinks will be a good fit in the company/school/agency... and chance is such a hard thing to accept or make sense of.
When you audition for parts, it's even more unpredictable! You can do a brilliant audition but someone else will just be "more right" than you. There are so many reasons not to choose you and many of them won't be within your control at all.
Feedback is really hard to give (as well as hard to receive sometimes!). Sometimes the truth is that you weren't very good, or that nerves overcame you. You might know this anyway, but hearing it is still very hard. Sometimes the person will try to dress the feedback up a bit and make it a bit kinder - and that can be confusing. Someone asked me for feedback from an audition and I found myself saying "you seemed to lack confidence, and I thought perhaps nerves got to you", whereas I actually thought she was rather rude and very wooden (though nerves might have had something to do with both these things). Sometimes (and I do think this is often the case) the auditioner doesn't have time to give you detailed feedback and so gives something entirely useless "just not quite right this time" - from which you can learn nothing at all. It doesn't even mean that they thought you were good, or in the running, because I'd be prepared to bet they give the same vague feedback to everyone! Occasionally you will get someone who will bother to give you more detailed feedback - but this can lead to endless agonising and you may not be satisfied even then. In my experience, more detailed feedback will often produce the urge to ask "what exactly do you mean by...."? - and of course CDs/Directors don't have time to discuss or clarify their feedback because they have a job to get on with!
The best way to get feedback I think, is from someone you trust, who knows your acting well - who can advise you and teach you and help you on your acting journey, with occasional help from an outside eye. In other words, feedback about your acting skills, not about a particular audition. I think that this is sort of thing that can help you to do better in future auditions (though you still may not get the job). I think audition practice is a good idea - to see whether you have some bad habits and to get you used to the bits of auditioning that don't have much to do with your acting skills.
Another problem with feedback is that if it deals with something technical (which is more likely for dancers and singers probably), then, although it can be very useful to highlight a skill area you can work on, it ignores the fact that is NOT someone with the best skill level that always gets the job. It's not like being a 100m runner, where the winner is the one who reaches the line first. How often have you watched someone with fantastic technique who leaves you unmoved, or someone who sings a song less than perfectly but who moves you to tears?
The other obvious problem with feedback is that one man's meat is another man's poison. You might "fix" a problem that someone else might regard as something wonderfully unique about you.
The other way to get feedback is indirectly : if you have been called in by a Casting Director and didn't get the job, and then that CD calls you in again it is a fair indication that they thought you did a good job last time. That should give you confidence. Also being pencilled or short-listed for a job (however frustrating it is not getting it) is very good feedback...
Anyone else have any views on this?